FACTORS LEADING TO PERINEAL INJURY DURING VAGINAL DELIVERY

Main Article Content

Dr Nahida Alim
Mohsina Saeed Zia
Rashna Khan Abbasi
Zara Allawat
Nafeesa Hameed
Attiya Ghulam Ghos

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the labour characteristics and other predictors of perineal injury in women delivering at a tertiary care hospital.


Place and Duration of Study: Conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology AIMS Hospital Muzaffarabad for six months after approval of synopsis.


Study Design: A cross-sectional analytical study.


Methodology: A total of 311 women who delivered vaginally were included. Labour duration was categorized into <6 hours, 6–12 hours, and >12 hours. The primary outcome was the occurrence of perineal injury. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression to determine the association between labour characteristics and perineal injury. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.


Results: Perineal injury occurred in 107 (34.4%) women. Labour duration was significantly associated with perineal injury (p=0.002). Women with labour lasting 6–12 hours had an increased risk of perineal injury (Adjusted OR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.30–4.37) compared to those with labour <6 hours. The highest risk was observed in women with labour >12 hours (Adjusted OR: 5.67, 95% CI: 2.76–11.7). Other significant predictors included primiparity and instrumental delivery.


Conclusion: Long duration of labour was significantly associated with higher risk of perineal injury. Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter tears include the following; identifying these women and implementing preventative strategies including perineal support techniques and controlled delivery may reduce morbidity. More studies are needed to investigate other contributing factors in other obstetric populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

FACTORS LEADING TO PERINEAL INJURY DURING VAGINAL DELIVERY. (2025). The Research of Medical Science Review, 3(6), 831-839. https://medscireview.net/index.php/Journal/article/view/1420